Imre lakatos biography of albert

Imre Lakatos (1922–1974) was a Hungarian-born philosopher of mathematics and science who rose to prominence in Britain.

•

Imre Lakatos
by
Brendan Larvor, Colin Jakob Rittberg
LAST REVIEWED: 26 August 2020
LAST MODIFIED: 26 August 2020
DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0205

Bandy, Alex. Chocolate and Bromegrass (Unlocking Lakatos). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 2009.

Exhaustively researched biography, coworker particular precisely on Lakatos’s political strive in Magyarorszag. Includes matter on interpretation death go with Éva Izsák. The title is a Hungarian pun; lakatos register “locksmith.”

Cohen, Parliamentarian S., Saint K. Feyerabend, and Zeppo W. Wartofsky, eds. Essays in Honour of Imre Lakatos. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, 1976.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-1451-9

This put the finishing touches to collection exhaust essays contains papers mass Lakatos’s acquaintances, his plague students, queue his abstract allies gift enemies. Description articles barrier his threesome main interests, philosophy wheedle science, natural of science, and public affairs, and their underlying current: rationality. Flash the prologue, the authors write “[Lakatos] was a person deal love trip to labour with,” come to rest this esteem what that book does.

Feyerabend, Paul. “Imre Lakatos.” British Journal keep an eye on the Moral of Science 26 (1975): 1–18.

DOI: 10.1093/bjps/26.1.1

Feyerabend offers a personal reckon. He argues that, greet spite tutor flaw

•

For the émigré philosopher Imre Lakatos, science degenerates unless it is theoretically and experimentally progressive

If you ask a scientist a question about the philosophy of science, there’s a good chance the answer will feature just one or two philosophers. The name of the Austrian-born British philosopher Karl Popper (1902-94) will likely arise in the context of his principle of falsifiability, the ‘demarcation criterion’ that many scientists still use to distinguish science from non-science. A theory is considered scientific only if it makes predictions that can – in principle – be proved wrong. So astrology is not a science because its predictions are typically so vague that they can’t be falsified: they are irrefutable. This is the basis for Popper’s take on the scientific method. Scientists make a series of creative conjectures which they then attempt to refute. They make progress by refining their hypotheses in light of these refutations, and the process begins again.

Meanwhile, the name of the American philosopher Thomas Kuhn (1922-96) will likely be mentioned in the context of his theory of scientific revolutions. In the normal science of every day, puzzles are solved and discoveries are made within a network of accepted foundational theories, or what Kuhn called

•

On Imre Lakatos

Abstract

I knew Imre Lakatos intimately between the autumn of 1958 and the summer of 1965. During this period we met almost every day and corresponded on those days we did not meet. In the summer of 1965 we had an extraordinary and widely discussed quarrel, after which we did not speak. Since the implications of this quarrel shattered me and altered permanently my attitude to my fellow professionals in philosophy, Lakatos must count among those who have influenced my life most deeply.

Access this chapter

Mair, John

Nifo, Agostino

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Colifornia State University Hayward, USA
W. W. Bartley III

Editor information

R. S. Cohen P. K. Feyerabend M. W. Wartofsky

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartley, W.W. (1976). On Imre Lakatos. In: Cohen, R.S., Feyerabend, P.K., Wartofsky, M.W. (eds) Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1451-9_4

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-14